۴۰۰ million dollar velvet revolution

Roberts, the former assistant of the US Treasury Department, in response to the extreme statements of some American extremist groups who called Iran’s elections a “coup”, asked what is the source of information of the American media and governments affiliated with the US on this matter?

 This source is nothing but the statement of the failed candidate of Iran that America also preferred him to win the election. This is while the published results of independent polls conducted by the “Non-Profit Public Polling Center” and the “New American Foundation” had announced the superiority of Ahmadinejad a few weeks before the elections. Referring to the American aid to the rioters, Roberts then writes: “There are many reports that inform about the US government’s plan to destabilize Iran.” According to one of these reports, General Mirza Aslam Beg, the former president The Pakistan Army announced: There are indisputable documents that indicate the involvement of the United States in Iran’s election issues. These documents “prove that the CIA has spent four hundred million dollars inside Iran in order to create a velvet revolution after the elections.” Referring to the Velvet Revolution in countries such as Georgia and Ukraine, Roberts writes: “There is a possibility that the failed candidate in Iran, Mirhossein Mousavi, was bought and received money as the executor of America’s demands.” The former assistant of the US Treasury Department adds: “If we look wisely at the Iranian elections, we should ask the Iranians if your country is constantly threatened with war or even a nuclear attack by the US and the Zionist regime, would you prefer it?” Give up your best defender and choose someone who is preferred by the US and Israel?” He then addresses the claimants of fraud in Iran’s elections and says: “Do you believe that the people of Iran will vote for someone who will turn Iran into a country that is under the influence of the United States?” He writes: “There are only a small percentage of Iranian youth who are easily organized by American money to oppose the Iranian government and the Islamic balance of this system. In fact, America is using Western-oriented Iranians to discredit the elections and the government of Iran.” The use of affiliated media to show the opposition of the Iranian government to the people of this country and show the invalidity of Iran’s elections.”368
Roberts wrote in another article: “We are now witnessing America’s efforts to establish a popular revolution in Iran under the leadership of the CIA, which is actually the Velvet Revolution. The American intervention and the wrong information that was published in coordination by the Western media, made it clear to us that the government or an individual is leading this process. On the other hand, we cannot forget that the West always wanted to overthrow the 1979 revolution in Iran in any way possible, and of course, to achieve this goal, it did not stop any action, including deception and even attack. It is becoming more and more difficult to believe that the western media is giving such a wide coverage to this event only because of the existing real conditions. According to the reports of various sources that reported on the Iranian elections, before the end of the counting of votes and without any substantiated evidence, Mr. Mousavi had called himself the winner and challenged any results before the announcement. While Mousavi was introduced as one of Hashemi Rafsanjani’s men, why shouldn’t it be believed that Ahmadinejad, in the same way that he had defeated Hashemi by a large margin, also achieved the same result against Mousavi? 
Before the Iranian elections, Kent Timmerman, one of the neoconservatives, revealed in his writings that a “color revolution” is being organized. He had written: There are “talks of a green revolution” in Tehran. Why did they organize protests before the election results were announced? The initial response to questionable elections cannot be pre-coordinated protests. Timmerman’s organization, “Democracy Foundation”, which is a subset of the National Democracy Foundation (NED), was established to promote American democracy in Iran. According to Timmerman, NED was providing financial assistance to pro-Mousavi groups that were in contact with non-governmental groups outside of Iran, but the American mass media ignored all these crucial facts. These media do not provide realistic analysis. They have started a propaganda war against the Iranian government. We know that the United States organizes terrorists outside of Iran and that these groups carry out terrorist operations such as bombings and other attacks. Therefore, it is also possible that these terrorists are responsible for actions such as setting fire to the bus and other destructive operations of protests in Tehran. One of the writers wrote that he was surprised by the appearance of tens of thousands of slanders about election fraud on Twitter. His investigations showed that all the users used had started working only the day after the election. He also referred to an article in the George Elm Post newspaper on June 14, claiming the role of the Israelis in this regard. Why do young people from other parts of the world, who are indifferent to the issue of electoral fraud anywhere else in the world, show sensitivity to the recent events in Iran?” 
Thierry Misan, the famous Western analyst whose books on 9/11 and the mysteries surrounding it made him a celebrity, has a similar take to that offered by Paul Roberts. According to the article he wrote on the “Voltnet” website, he called Tehran’s “Green Revolution” the latest version of 
He called “color revolutions”. The revolutions that enabled America to bring its puppet governments to power in several countries without the need to use force. Misan, who does not consider “color revolutions” as “revolutions”, has advised two countries facing this crisis so far. He writes about color revolutions: They look like revolutions because they mobilize large sections of the population, but they are more like “power grabs” because they don’t aim to change social structures. They lead the hopes towards the replacement of one ruling class with another class, in order to implement pro-American foreign and economic policies. According to Maysan, the main mechanism of “color revolutions” is to focus popular anger on the desired goals. This is an aspect of mass psychology that destroys everything in its path and no logical argument can stand against it. The one whose wall is the shortest will be blamed for all the calamities that have afflicted the country for at least one generation. After referring to various countries that have experienced color revolutions, Tiri Misan deals with the issue of Iran. In explaining this issue, he writes: First, in 2007, a budget of four hundred million dollars was approved by the Congress to organize a “regime change” in Iran.