2

Transgenic biological warfare

  • کد خبر : 4267
  • 04 December 2022 - 10:32
Transgenic biological warfare

  What does transgenic (genetically manipulated) mean? When a piece of “DNA” of an organism or a complete gene of an organism is isolated and inserted into the set of genes (genome) of another organism, the new organism is called a transgenic organism. In short, transgenics are also called GMO. Is the human information of […]

 

What does transgenic (genetically manipulated) mean?
When a piece of “DNA” of an organism or a complete gene of an organism is isolated and inserted into the set of genes (genome) of another organism, the new organism is called a transgenic organism.
In short, transgenics are also called GMO.

Is the human information of its own genome and other living organisms like plants complete?
According to the latest statistics, about 19,000 to 20,000 genes have been identified in each human cell (there is no doubt about 1000 genes), which constitute only one and a half percent of the total human DNA. Also, the human genome is made of about 6 billion pairs of nucleotides, and information about the function of more than 98% of the human genome has not yet been obtained. So far, the functions and functions of more than 90% of the genomes of many plants and other organisms with millions of nucleotides are unclear, and no one knows their function yet.
Now, is it correct to manipulate on a large scale in something that we do not know enough about and is related to the death, life and health of organisms and insert a gene among several unknown components (functionally) whose reaction we do not know What will be in relation to each other?

Which countries and institutions are the most important supporters of transgenic products?
The American government is the most important creator and supporter of transgenic (genetically manipulated) products, and American Zionist companies and companies have the first word about the commercial production and export of transgenic (genetically manipulated) products.
Monsanto, DaPont, Bayer, Dow, Syngenta and Bayer. A.S.F. are big companies supporting transgenic (genetically manipulated) agricultural products, except for the last two (Switzerland and Germany), all of them are located in America, and except for one of them, they all produce harmful chemicals, herbicides, and pesticides.

What are the other big companies producing and supporting transgenic products in the world?
Other companies that support transgenic (genetically manipulated) are also often producers of carcinogenic, harmful chemicals and herbicides and pesticides, etc., and at different times the Zionist companies DaPont, Bayer (has 315 branches worldwide), Dow and Monsanto with They have cooperated and supported each other against the laws. Another company that is now a producer and supporter of transgenic (genetically manipulated) products is the “Bayer” company, this company also committed crimes such as supplying chemical weapons of mass destruction (chlorine and mustard gases and toxic organophosphate compounds and Zyklon B) in World War I and Second, in the war with the Congo, and conducting unauthorized experiments on humans, etc. Dow partnered with Monsanto in the production of Agent Orange and subsequent legal protections. The question that comes to mind is, is it possible to believe that these Zionist companies that produce deadly and maiming substances for millions of people around the world are now thinking of producing food for people so that people do not die of starvation?

What do you know about the American company Monsanto as the most famous and most important investor in the matter of transgenic (genetically manipulated)?
The most famous and most important investor company in the matter of transgenic (genetic manipulation), which is considered the mother of agricultural biotechnology, is the dreaded American company Monsanto, which has had a long history in the field of research and production of weapons of mass destruction. Before that, the founders of Monsanto were engaged in the business of transporting blacks from Africa to America and selling slaves.
The Monsanto company was founded in 1901 by John Francis Quinney, a member of the Freemasonry group (a satanic think tank and a tool to use elite intellectual power to help the Zionists) Knights of Malta. This company conducted uranium research in the framework of the Manhattan Project, which was responsible for the production of the first atomic bomb, and in cooperation with the American government, which led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1943-1945). In addition, the Monsanto company produced the chemical agent “Agent Orange” in cooperation with the Dow company (which company is also active in the field of transgenic business (genetic manipulation of agricultural products)) and knowing that this substance is deadly and dangerous, it was given to the government. The US decided to use it on a large scale to destroy the leaves of the Vietnamese forests in order to identify the hiding places of the Vietnamese. This highly lethal substance caused the death of half a million citizens, half a million Vietnamese babies were deformed, and even thousands of American soldiers were chemically treated, the effects of which continue to this day. Commercial production of other dangerous substances such as saccharin, PCBs, the dangerous pesticide DDT, aspartame (causing diseases such as MS, causing cancer and large cavities in the brain, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other diseases according to research by the US Food and Drug Administration), the herbicide Roundup or glyphosate (which It is very strong and has side effects for humans such as cancer, growth disorders, and birth defects) and other toxic substances that each have side effects and cause problems are also in the history of this company. In addition, Monsanto provided the Israeli Ministry of War with the banned chemical “White Phosphorus” in the Gaza War to burn the skin, flesh and bones of Palestinians at a temperature of 2760 degrees and kill them in 2008 and 2009. In 1994, Monsanto bought as many American seed companies as possible and genetically modified their seeds in an irreversible way (producing terminator seeds) to permanently eliminate both competitors and people for food. Become affiliated with Monsanto. After developing in 2000, Monsanto introduced itself as a purely agricultural (agricultural biotechnology) company!

Do genetically modified products have advantages and superiority?
Transgenic products do not have real advantages and superiority, both experts and farmers say this:
An expert: Transgenic seeds do not do anything special, and they do not have superior yield and performance. They are simply either resistant to herbicides or produce their own insecticides, both of which are harmful and harm nature. Meanwhile, fighting against pests and… There are alternative ways. The rice farmer sample work: see; Why do we want to touch the genes of the seeds? For example, they say it has more advantages; For example, they say that while we have a water and food crisis, it is possible to produce more by using these seeds. If it is not like that at all! The yield is not high at all with those engineered seed cultivars they suggest for cultivation. Its production per hectare is not productive at all. It is about 4 tons per hectare, which cannot stop imports; And we are not self-sufficient with this manipulated seed.

Why are some of the most important countries in the world and free scientists against transgenic (genetically manipulated)?
The fact is that in many European countries transgenics (genetic manipulation) have been banned because in European countries, rationality and scientism prevail more than America, which is long and wide and capitalist and capitalist, important countries such as France, Germany and Russia. And 25 other countries of the European continent (most of the members of the European Union) and other countries from around the world, including Turkey and Saudi Arabia, have banned the cultivation of genetically modified (genetically manipulated) food crops in their country.
The reasons for the opposition of scientists and independent researchers to transgenics are as follows:
۱- Insufficient human knowledge, despite all the advances, about the function of more than 98% of the human genome (and more percentages in most other living organisms) and the exact number of genes of many organisms, including humans! 2- Inadequate human knowledge regarding the specific conditions of gene expression (gene expression means making protein from genes, the gene inserted into a plant or animal may actually turn into another gene under certain conditions, for example, a gene that creates a carcinogenic protein or a gene that creates a poison And this case is never checked in laboratories.)
۳- Inadequate human knowledge of all human traits and even other organisms (proteins determine the traits of living organisms, including humans, and humans have not yet done any research on some genetic traits.) 4- Impossibility of complete and comprehensive investigations of the effects of transferred genes Due to the large number and long-term and generally expensive, tests to prove safety for the environment, animals and humans are practically impossible. 5- Failure to fully investigate all the effects of the transferred gene, even when one gene causes the production of several proteins: After gene transfer in the laboratory, we only check the approximate presence of the same nucleotides and finally a production protein and one or two desired traits, while each gene may control and cause several traits.
۶- Failure to fully investigate the effects of the gene transferred during human generations: In the studies that are carried out after transferring the gene to another organism in the world, only the effect of the gene transfer in one human generation can be checked (and sometimes it is not done at all and only 90 days of testing laboratory mice are used) and multi-generation tests are not performed. .
۷- The creation of unknown pathogenic or carcinogenic proteins due to the breaking of a gene and placing it in the middle of another gene: With conventional methods of gene transfer, usually the location of the gene inserted into the living organism is known, that is, it is known which organ or cell of the organism this gene enters, but since we introduce thousands of copies and copies of the gene into the plant, it is not clear that all those copies A gene will sit exactly where the genes of that organ or that cell are, and the gene may be broken and sit in the middle of another gene.
۸- It is an unnatural method: In genetic engineering, gene transfer is of two types: Vertical transfer and horizontal transfer.
Vertical transmission takes place through reproduction, but horizontal transmission is what happens in transgenics, and they do something that is almost impossible in nature, that is, the transfer of genes from one organism to another that may not be similar to each other, such as gene transfer. From grasshopper to horse or gene transfer from fish to elephant and…
۹- Not giving nature a chance to rebuild itself: If there is a mutation or gene transfer in nature, that mutation or genetic change will be selected by the complex system of nature and natural selection over centuries, and if it is undesirable, it will be removed naturally. When genetic engineers repeatedly genetically manipulate plants and introduce transgenic (genetically manipulated) plants into nature, the factory of existence and the ecosystem will undergo irreparable damage. Like a factory where the production quantity is so high that there is no opportunity for quality control and segregation of defective products. 10- There is a possibility of transmission of abnormalities caused by gene transfer, such as those mentioned in the above cases, to weeds and plants of nearby fields and its dispersion in nature (gene escape) and creating natural hazards. For example, the production of thousands of poisonous and carcinogenic plants for feeding organisms and for humans will be one of its results. Resistance to insects is associated with the transfer of a gene that produces an insecticidal poison, which may be a type of protein, to the plant, and then, for example, the insecticidal poison is also produced in the leaves or other organs of the plant.
۱۱- Resistance of bacteria and microbes to antibiotics: Another risk raised in the production of transgenic species with antibiotic resistance genes is the possibility of transferring these genes to bacteria, an example of which was the transfer of ampicillin resistance gene in Bt corn of “Novartis Seed” company. Of course, there is always the possibility of gene transfer to bacteria, and by producing transgenic plants, we increase the dose of antibiotic-resistant gene in nature, which causes resistance to antibiotics, etc. 12- Some methods of gene transfer are carcinogenic and dangerous: The use of incorrect methods for gene transfer is one of the proven causes of some cancers. For example, gene transfer using a virus in the transfer of ADA enzyme, which is effective in the efficiency of the immune system, has led to cancer.
۱۳-Possibility of abuse by killer fraudsters: Due to the fact that the technique of gene transfer is very small, technical, laboratory, and expensive, fraudsters and murderers may insert inappropriate genes into plants or other organisms during their experiments (such as organizations that spread dangerous and deadly diseases in order to sell drugs and vaccines). like the manufacturing and commercial distribution of the deadly VIOXX vaccine in the US with the support of the FDA, which killed more than 60,000 people and caused 130,000 heart attacks.

Is GM the only way to fight pests?

An example farmer: If the problem is biological warfare, we are doing biological warfare. As much as we exploit the land, we do not poison it; Our water sources are the same model that is used for all seeds. If we are really concerned, we can improve the rest of our problems, including technologies, policies, etc. in the agricultural sector; Why did we go to the seed? These are genetically modified seeds, under the pretext of stem-eating worms. I am an example; I did biological control and I don’t have stem-eating worms at all. I don’t need genetically modified seeds. We use very little poison. A bag of poison cost fifty to sixty thousand tomans until last year; I buy a pack of 100 bees for each hectare for up to ten or twelve thousand tomans.

How does the use of genetically modified crops reduce biodiversity and risk to the environment?
Due to the increased use of toxins and the production of protein toxins in the green parts of pest-resistant transgenic plants, genetic changes cause damage to some organisms (such as pests and insects) in the ecosystem and reduce their biodiversity and are a danger to the environment. On the other hand, a manipulated plant infected with a foreign gene, if it is cultivated in the field, this contamination will spread in the environment by pollination and will contaminate native cultivars and other genetic resources and put biodiversity at risk of destruction. will give.

How will transgenic technology destroy the country’s useful genetic resources against bioterrorist attacks?
The enemy, in any possible way, seeks to remove genetic resources from Iran and register them in their own country (and ultimately destroy them in Iran). This is while this same genetic reserves and its diversity (due to their powerful genes) is the best factor to deal with any kind of bioterrorist and agroterrorist attacks. Now some people in the name of science!? In some institutions and even universities, medicinal plants are being transmuted, which, in addition to the possibility of creating toxic or allergenic substances in them, will lead to the removal and reduction of their properties and will also be a threat to the durability of their presence in the ecosystem. In this case, the improvement of many The incurable and fatal diseases that are currently being treated with the help of traditional medicine will not be cured, and the countermeasures against bioterrorist attacks will be out of reach.

Are there any real scientific articles about the safety of genetically modified foods?
no There are no scientific and accurate articles about the safety of genetically modified crops. They simply make unscientific and imprecise generalizations about GMOs as a reason for their cultivation, or they state documents that cannot be refuted or proven, for example, they say with generalizations during the last 20 years! who have used transgenics in some countries, they have not observed any special disease caused by transgenics! While it is unlikely that a person or a team in these 20 years have continuously worked and taken notes on this matter and by referring to hospitals or even sick people or by taking available possible documents, their nutrition and the percentage of use of, for example, cancer patients or Parents of autism patients have calculated genetics. If they had documents, they would definitely provide them.

Why forcing farmers to use only one type of cultivation is dangerous?
One of the concerns about genetically modified crops is that because the production company provides only one type of seed to the farmer, monoculture will occur in these crops, and as a result, biodiversity will decrease or disappear. In addition to reducing biodiversity, monoculture may be effective in the spread or epidemic of a particular disease and the entire farm may be destroyed by the attack of a disease or pest.

What about the ban on the cultivation of transgenics in other countries?
Many countries (at least 37 countries), such as European countries, which have had a history of using GMOs, have now banned the cultivation of genetically modified crops after their many side effects and toxins. Probably, cases such as fatal poisoning caused by transgenic cucumbers in Europe and the spread of cancers and various diseases have not been unaffected in these decisions.

Is the resistance of transgenic plants to herbicides a desirable advantage?
The superiority of existing transgenic plants is due to their resistance to herbicides, which is not desirable at all because:
A- It causes more herbicide to be consumed because the main plant is not damaged and the farmer tends to create a completely clean field.
B- It causes multiple consumption of poison because pests and plants are alive and resistant to poisons.
C- It causes the destruction of useful weeds, which are considered genetic reserves, and reduces biodiversity.
D- It causes the farmer to depend on the GM factory for the production of poison because the poison must be suitable for the plant.
E- The poison used in transgenics is glyphosate or Roundup, which the joint committee of the World Health Organization and FAO have concluded based on the opinion of the International Association for Research on Cancer that the dominant herbicide in transgenic products, namely glyphosate, is carcinogenic. While the use of this herbicide has increased 15 times since the commercialization of transgenic crops in 1996.
And – it causes the effects of the poison to remain in the ground and even in later years it loses the ability to cultivate other plants sensitive to the herbicide, which means the gradual loss of genetic diversity.

Is it possible to use genetically engineered products as a weapon against the target country?
two researchers; During the Persian Gulf War, Dr. Grath Nicholson and his wife, Nancy, found a bacteria in the blood of about half of the soldiers who got sick in the Persian Gulf War, which contained some amount of the AIDS virus (HIV). It was clear that this microbe is man-made and its genetics is engineered for biological warfare, or the creation of biological weapons, such as the biotechnological production of the Ebola virus, anthrax, and black plague bacteria at the Dimona Institute by the Israeli regime. With agricultural biotechnology, there is no need to directly use drugs, vaccines, etc., but without anyone knowing, they put the desired disease genes in fruits, vegetables, grains, and even animal products, either by foreign enemies by importing or by internal mercenaries. For example, a sterility gene can be installed on wheat to sterilize a generation of a country.

Is the use of transgenic products mandatory and unavoidable?
According to a large number of researchers and farmers, there is practically no need to use transgenics because compared to natural cultivars, they do not have a high yield and their good properties, such as resistance to pests and herbicides, are full of losses and disadvantages, and if there are limitations, other methods for There is a way to fix them, for example, to fight against pests and diseases, you can use the simultaneous planting of various cultivars, and with biological control, safe biological agents, such as some ladybugs and Trichogramma bees, etc., can be used to fight against pests. to exchange useful and effective experiences, or, for example, to solve the problem of water shortage, it is necessary to reform the water management system, restore water rights and fight against unauthorized wells that lead to the drying up of farmers’ canals and wells, and improve irrigation methods. For example, Dad used drip irrigation, etc., he banned the cultivation of plants that consume a lot of water, including transgenic corn, as well as the eucalyptus plant, which intensively harvests groundwater, etc.

Question 15- Is the nutritional value of genetically engineered products higher than natural products?
Based on the researches, there are strong reasons that the content of nutrients in transgenic foods is far less than non-transgenic foods and their use will lead to food poverty. In non-GM crops, higher levels of antioxidants, higher nutrients, more energy and healthier protein, better farming practices all lead to better crops than GM crops.

How will transgenic products cause the dependence of governments and a threat to national security?
Genetically modified products will depend on farmers, governments and a certain company or group and will be a threat to national security. Can food dependence on a specific group, especially for strategic products, not be considered a national threat? In this case, each and every one of our farmers and, accordingly, the consumers and even the government, which should provide the people’s needs, become 100% dependent on one group, which can easily put everyone in a tight spot; and don’t give seed to anyone else; Or determine the conditions and put the government under his control by putting food pressure on the people.
Isn’t this another example of the implementation of Henry Kissinger’s advice that says: “Control oil so you can control nations, control food so you can control people.”

What are the documented reports of transgenic pathogenicity?
۱- Autism: some studies show a direct connection between the consumption of transgenic products and certain diseases such as autism. 2- Cancer due to the special toxin of transgenics: the joint committee of the World Health Organization and FAO, based on the opinion of the International Association for Research on Cancer, have come to the conclusion that The dominant herbicide in transgenic crops is glyphosate, a carcinogen. 3- The American Academy of Environmental Medicine AAEM has mentioned the effects of consuming GM products including damaged internal organs, digestive system disorders, immune system disorders, increased aging and infertility. 4- Maternal and fetal blood poisoning: a research In Canada, it has shown the presence of pesticides associated with genetically modified foods in the blood of women, pregnant mothers and fetuses. 5-The DNA of genetically engineered crops is transmitted to humans who eat them. In a new study published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) peer-reviewed journal, researchers assert that there is sufficient evidence that food DNA fragments contain complete genes. which can enter the human circulatory system through an unknown mechanism.
۶- Autoimmune disorder, celiac disease whose symptoms include intestinal permeability, unbalanced intestinal bacteria, immune system disorder and allergic reaction, digestion disorder and damage to the intestinal wall. New studies link processed foods to gluten disorders in 18 million Americans. 7- Congenital defects due to special transgenic poison: glyphosate (herbicide) is related to birth defects. The European Union Commission has known since 2002 that glyphosate causes abnormalities. 8- Autism, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s: A study has linked the herbicide glyphosate to autism, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. 9- Rapid and high mortality, breast cancer in female rats (almost in all cases), damage to the pituitary gland, congestion and necrosis of the liver, kidney problems and many other diseases.

Is it true that if we don’t grow transgenic rice, the society will starve?

No, it is not true at all. First of all, rice and most other transgenic products are not functionally superior to normal and natural rice, but only have genes for resistance to pests and herbicides, which has a natural and effective solution to pest damage and does not require genetic modification. On the other hand, They don’t bring land from another place, but the same land where natural and healthy rice is grown, are allocated to transgenics with almost the same yield, so the cultivation of artificial products does not satisfy the people and the need for imports remains.

Another advantage that they say is the resistance of transgenics to pests, is this a desirable advantage?
This feature is not desirable at all because: A- The gene that produces insecticidal protein from Bt bacteria known as Cry has been added to these plants, which cause the death of pest insects that feed on this plant. The poison added to the transgenic plants not only repels pests, but also leads to the destruction of insects. On the other hand, it was observed in America that a generation of a rare butterfly named Danaus Plexipuss also died because of this, as well as the generation of honey bees that cause pollination. and the survival of green life on earth, according to a group of Canadian beekeepers, bees that are present near artificial grain fields die because of the poison in these plants, and some beekeepers in Iran have made similar statements.
B- In engineered plants, there is resistance to one type of pest, such as stem eaters, so poison should be used for example for leaf eaters and other types of pests.
C- The amount of pesticide consumption will increase because when the pest cannot use its food, it will mutate or be replaced by other pests that are resistant, like what happened in Pakistan, and instead of profit, only harm will come from manipulated cotton. They earned it.
D- There is also the concern that the ecosystem of the soil and creatures, as well as insects as the second cycle, and the birds that eat these insects as the third cycle, and animals, birds and humans in the next cycles, will be harmed, and there are such experiences in practice. . For example, in Germany, pest-resistant corn caused a 10% increase in deaths and abortions in a cattle farm between 1998 and 2001, and the Swiss company producing transgenic corn seeds removed the questionable corn seeds from the market in addition to paying compensation. Will those poisons that affect cattle have no effect on humans?

What are the risks of farmers’ dependence on the products of the seed company, such as herbicides and fertilizers?
We have several different types and cultivars of every type of plant in our nature, adapted to weather conditions and suitable to our needs and tastes; This is called “biodiversity”. But the transgenic crop that is bought from a particular company is usually only one type, and if a disease or pest is found that is sensitive to it, all the fields or fields will be destroyed. It is disposable; So we cannot reproduce from this seed; While farmers can plant in many years (this year and next year and after that) by using natural seeds. In this way, genetically modified products become 100% dependent on that company for the purpose of seed preparation; In addition, for the cultivation of manipulated seeds, appropriate poisons and fertilizers are needed according to the recommendations of the seed manufacturer. Because the seeds need poison and fertilizer to grow. This means that each and every one of our farmers become 100% dependent on a group, which can easily put them in a tight spot and not give seeds to anyone. Or set conditions for them, or ask them for exclusive rights for their transgenic products in the future, or even, for example, confiscate their lands and property due to debt.
In India, some farmers set themselves on fire and self-immolated because of the debt to Monsanto and the pressures on their farms.

What is the basic and path-breaking solution for eliminating the need to import this volume of transgenics?
In order to eliminate the need to import this volume of transgenics (more than 50%), at least 6 solutions should be put on the agenda in a jihadist manner:
۱- The first solution is domestic production in cultivated lands plus the import of non-transgenic and natural products.
۲-Maximizing the harvest of natural seeds by natural pest control such as the simultaneous use of several different varieties or biological pest control (using natural enemies of pests such as some bees or some ladybugs) and…
۳- Research about the accuracy of statistics: Is it necessary to import 60% transgenics? (while we are well informed about the weakness of statistics in the country).
۴- The use of effective and natural methods of classical breeding, such as hybridization, introgression, backcrossing, periodic and mass selections, etc. (which are actually the natural addition and reduction of genes) and unfortunately, they are not focused on. 5- Planning to improve the soil structure and cultivate large infertile lands in Iran with new solutions and investment in this field.
۶- According to researchers and farmers, the percentage of waste of some agricultural products in our country is very impressive and according to statistics, it reaches several hundred million tons per year. It is better to consider planning for optimal use of available resources and reducing waste and loss of domestically produced products and online marketing of products even through the air transportation system.
۷- If, as some gentlemen say, only about 50% of the country’s needs are met with organic and natural cultivation, and we rely on imports for about 50%, it seems that now is the time to create culture for people to act rationally and change their lifestyles. According to the needs of the society, every family should somehow play a role in the production of healthy agricultural products and it can even be planned.

mostajar

لینک کوتاه : https://mostajar.com/en/?p=4267

برچسب ها

ثبت دیدگاه

مجموع دیدگاهها : 0در انتظار بررسی : 0انتشار یافته : 0
قوانین ارسال دیدگاه
  • دیدگاه های ارسال شده توسط شما، پس از تایید توسط تیم مدیریت در وب منتشر خواهد شد.
  • پیام هایی که حاوی تهمت یا افترا باشد منتشر نخواهد شد.
  • پیام هایی که به غیر از زبان فارسی یا غیر مرتبط باشد منتشر نخواهد شد.