Although there is still a lot of time left until the upcoming elections of the 9th term of the Islamic Council, discussions have been started among political groups regarding the vision of unity and how to participate in these elections.
In the past few days, the official and unofficial news published in the media indicate the efforts of the fundamentalist movement to reach a mechanism similar to the one that existed in the 8th Parliament elections, although some sources have declared the published names to be speculative.
A brief overview of what has happened in the past year can somewhat clarify the current situation of fundamentalism.
At the beginning of November 2019, after the concerns of the fundamentalist currents for the ninth term of the Islamic Council elections, a 30-member committee of fundamentalist political figures met with the president.
This meeting was held at the request of Asgar Oladi and at the invitation of Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad, on the night of November 7, in the Shahid Beheshti building of the Presidency, so that fundamentalists have more points in common with each other in the elections ahead.
In this meeting, in addition to the figures who did not come to the meeting despite the invitation, personalities such as Gholam Ali Haddad Adel, Ali Akbar Velayati, Mohammad Reza Bahnar, Ali Larijani, Hossein Fadaei, Ezzatullah Zarghami, Habibollah Asgrawaladi, Ali Akbar Abu Tarabi, Ali Reza Zakhani, Mehrdad Bazarpash, Mojtabi Samra Hashemi, Mohammad Faruzandeh, Mohammad Reza Ashtiani, Bijan Zabihi, Mohammad Reza Mirtaj Eldini, Morteza Agha Tehrani, Mehdi Kochakzadeh, Hamid Rasai, Ali Asghar Zarei, Mohammad Reza Rahimi, Masoud Zaribafan, Ibrahim Azizi, Hamidreza Haj Babaei, Sadeq Product, Asadullah Badamchian, Mohammad Nabi Habibi, Mohsen Kohkan and Haider Moslehi were present.
After this 30-member meeting, a three-member committee consisting of Asgrawaladi, Velayati, and Haddad Adel was assigned to meet with the president and inform him of the process.
But after the two universities entered the fundamentalist unity process, which was proposed by Ayatollah Mahdavi Keni, and with many studies between the two universities and the fundamentalist groups, the 8+7 committee replaced the 3-person committee.
The new committee for the unity of fundamentalists is a combination of two committees of 7 and 8 members (7 + 8). The 7-member committee is composed of representatives of the Mubarez clergy community and the teaching community of Qom seminary (4 people) along with the committee members including Asgarovaladi, Haddad Adel and Velayati. .
The 8-member committee was supposed to be formed in such a way that the front of the followers of the Imam and the leadership has 2 members, the reformist fundamentalists have 2 members, Raihe Khosh-Khemt has 2 members, and each of Mr. Larijani and Mr. Qalibaf have one member as their representative to this committee. introduce
Now, after several weeks, 15 possible members of this committee have been determined.
Based on this, Ayatollah Kaabi and Ayatollah Hosseini Bushehri have joined this committee as representatives of Ayatollah Yazdi, the head of Qom seminary community, Hojjat al-Islam Seyedreza Taqvi and Hojjat al-Islam Muhammad Hassan Abu Torabi Fard as representatives of the fighting clergy community.
Also, Mohammadreza Bahner and Manouchehr Mottaki as representatives of the Imam and Leaders Front, Alireza Zakani and Hossein Fadaei as representatives of reformist fundamentalists, Kazem Jalali as representative of Ali Larijani, Hojjat al-Islam Kashishi as representative of Qalibaf and Hojjat al-Islam wal Muslimin Agha Tehrani as representatives One of the representatives of Raheha Khosh-serv has been introduced to this committee.
Among Mr. Ismail Kothari, Mr. Kamran Bagheri Lankarani, and Mr. Gholamhossein Elham, the second person, Mr. Raiheh Khosh Khemt, will be added to the 15-member committee.
Also, some news sources had previously reported the membership of “Mohammed Hossein Safar Harandi” in this committee, which he denied in an interview with Fars.
At the same time, some observers are of the opinion that the contribution of the third movement of Tir and the discourse of the revolution in this mechanism should be much more than it is, and at the same time, maximum care should be taken so that those who were not willing to demarcate the borders with the seditionists in 1988, enter this process. do not find
But the situation in the course of reformism is somewhat different. The reality is that the leading figures of this movement have not yet defined their boundaries with the sedition leaders and rioters after the 1988 presidential election.
This issue has caused some doubt in its re-acceptance into the system.
The insistence of the elements of this movement on the deviant thoughts of the past, such as the brazen letter of Mohammad Reza Khatami, a member of the disbanded party, to the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, proves that the reformist movement mixed with the sedition movement has not only expressed regret for its past, but also The former insists.
Of course, the strategy of cleansing the faces of this movement, including Seyyed Mohammad Khatami, is on their agenda.
Fars wrote about this: For some time, Mohammad Khatami, who is one of the main accused and the leaders of the 88 sedition, has used every opportunity to clear his face step by step in the eyes of public opinion and wants to present himself as the leader of the reform process. Finally, it can be clearly understood that this meaningful effort speaks of the main strategy of the reformists, which is to be present in the political arena at any cost.
Khatami, who is making a lot of efforts to return to power and normalize his presence, these days does not even pass the funeral of the girl who died on the management bridge with the stabbing of her suitor Samaj.
The policy that this failed trend has adopted today is the policy of “retreating with hands and pushing forward with feet”; In such a way that some of the internal and external voices related to this trend are in tune with the green seditionists in trying to convince the reformists and the green sect to participate in the upcoming elections, and some others are trying to talk about the condition and conditions for participating in the elections or banning it, therefore, this article undoubtedly shows the opinion of the members of this movement who want a share and seek opportunities, which is now on the agenda of the reformist movement, is to create a difference between the rival movement.
These days, the reformists have made their first agenda to create differences among the fundamentalists and to take hypocritical measures to create multiple voices in the ranks of the fundamentalists, and they are trying to fuel some differences of opinion by playing with a few seemingly fundamentalist figures.
What is the fact that Mohammad Khatami recently emphasized the creation of differences between fundamentalists in a meeting attended by advisors and influential people of Khordad II and said: “It is possible to achieve success by fomenting differences between the fundamentalists, but with the situation created by Mousavi and Karroubi, the greatest betrayal of the reformists was formed by them. If they had not sabotaged like this, we would have entered the political arena heroically.”
The result is that; All the real sympathizers and actors in the political arena, who are passionate about the fate of this country and its unique people, and who are true fundamentalists, should know what their role and duties are in this critical moment, and put the wise leader of the revolution at the forefront of their actions and words. to give so that “this revolution does not fall into the hands of the unworthy and unprivileged and liberals”.
Mostajar
