The most important effect of developments in the Arab-Islamic region has been its security effect, this security effect has been manifested in two ways; One side is the collapse of the past security structures and order, and the other side is the emergence of a platform for the formation of a new security structure and order.
In the meantime, the powers that played the role of “custodians” of the existing regional security structures in the past are living in a state of fear and hope because depending on the future security structure and order – whether they agree or oppose – with Either they consider themselves as losers or winners, and those powers that played the “opposing role” of the regional security structure and order in the past, consider themselves as the definite winners of the security developments in the region, and in fact It is the same, but in the meantime, “maximizing” the security interests has become especially important for these powers and they demand special provision..
The security developments in the region, which led to the collapse of the American security structure, have undergone a major change in the literature and summaries of the West, especially the United States and its regional appendage, the Zionist regime. Kurds have a lot of time at their disposal, and with ease and using economic, media and diplomatic tools, they can overcome Iran’s containment and even the collapse of its political power, but the collapse of Egypt’s political system and a serious weakening of the regional power of Saudi Arabia will lead to the West. He reminded that time is in Iran’s favor.
After the 1988 sedition, America and the West as a whole thought that the Islamic Republic of Iran had suffered an uncontrollable internal crisis and that the West could change Iran’s behavior by supporting the opposition and without directly taking action. – and even handing over the government – the maximum goal – to force them on this basis, during the years 2009 and 2010, the official approval of the budget to help the civil and political opponents of the Islamic Republic system was brought up with more seriousness and openness, along with the launch of mass communication media. New and more severe economic restrictions followed. But when the popular and Islamic developments in the Arab region began and clear signs of the spiritual connection of the youth of the Arab communities with the Islamic revolution and its leadership emerged, the West was once again forced to rewrite its security policy towards Iran. In the new security policy of America and the West in general, there are elements from the past plans, but these elements have changed from “objective elements” to “helping elements” and the central elements of the past plans have been reduced to text elements in the new design of the security policy. And more important element or elements have been included in this design.
In order to know what has happened in the security planning of the West against Iran, let’s take a look at one of the dozens of reports, memos and news that have been written in the decision-making circles of the West in this regard. “Ari Shabit” is one of the prominent strategists of the Zionist regime. In his summary note, he puts forward 8 strategic principles. His note was published in “Haaretz” newspaper on Thursday last week, and it is definitely not considered a personal comment, because the parts of his content are in the reports and summaries of important political centers of the West, including in the report 3 days ago. The support is also seen.
In this regard, Shabit refers to two categories of actions, actions that have an auxiliary role and at the same time are accompanied by several considerations, and actions that have a central role and are not involved in considerations. Shabit says, we should realistically put aside the issue of military war, the issue of nuclear containment, and the issue of comprehensive sanctions against Iran, and of course we should talk about it. – I mean, let’s not count on it, and at the same time, because not talking about them gives the smell of backing down against Iran, let’s talk about them – this Israeli strategist says that the West’s emphasis on sanctions and the nuclear issue and talking about war It incites the sensitivity of Iranians against the West, and at the same time, it is very difficult and almost impossible to realize them in the real world. He says that there is a third way between accepting and confronting Iran, which – according to his false opinion – will bring the West to a conclusion. Shabit evaluates this road as an internal road of Iran. He says that the issue that the West has not paid much attention to is the “possibility” of weakening and even collapsing Iran through differences within the Iranian system. Shabit writes in the eighth principle: “What is worrying about Iran is not the hidden thing – the issue of nuclear weapons – but the apparent thing – Iran’s serious role in the region – and at the same time, what is not seen is the possibility of achieving success in developing differences within the Iranian system. ». He says why Israeli and Western intelligence agencies have not paid enough attention to the importance of this issue“
In several analyzes of the Zionist, American and British centers, it is stated that the new differences between the government and the parliament are a historic opportunity to hit the Islamic Republic. These centers say that we should show by citing the existing differences that the Iranian authorities are deeply involved in the power struggle and the people. They have forgotten about their problems just a few days ago after the BBC broadcasted pictures and analysis about the Varamin incident – during which several people were gang-raped – and the claim that social insecurity is spreading in Iran – which of course For that reason, he could not mention some cases – he has implied in one or two sentences that “Iranian officials do not have a chance to deal with people’s problems because of internal disputes!” Leave this insidious comment aside from the fact that in the international financial crisis of 2010 and 2011, Iran saw the least damage and was so strong under these conditions that it implemented the subsidy targeting plan and leave this comment aside. The fact that the developments in the region have had the most benefits for Iran.
Creating a crisis within the system and then transferring it to the social body with the intention of separating people from the system is not possible except by highlighting the differences on the one hand and blackmailing Iran’s situation. Some of the forces, groups, newspapers and even some of the internal institutions provide these documents to the enemy for free. Disregarding the country’s economy, showing the dark future of the subsidy targeting plan, doubting the official statistics of the country several times are considered to be part of the function of the insiders. You can ask official institutions, but you should not doubt the correctness of the statistics they give. Of course, disparagement and denigration has different aspects, one aspect is that within the government, parliament, etc., there are small and insignificant groups that usually occupy the surroundings of senior officials and then turn that official against the institutions and Other legal centers force to take a position. During the last 3-4 years, one of these small groups has tried a lot to separate the government from the clergy, to separate the government from its pure and serious supporters, to separate the government from the parliament, and even to create a serious confrontation between the government and… In this way, he has imposed a lot of expenses on the honorable president. On the other hand, outside the government, there are groups and spectrums that turn to the “last solution” – removal – in the face of any unacceptable phenomenon, and among these are many legal ways – the powers of the Guardian Council, the powers of the Majlis, etc. .. are ignored or considered to be of little importance. Meanwhile, the involvement of individuals in many controversies does not help to “solve the problem” and who doubts that the expansion of the atmosphere of mistrust of the military forces towards each other and the development of conflict between institutions Officially, the system is the biggest service to Western spy agencies. It should be said to these people that if there is a sin that needs to be remembered, it is the weakening of the system and fueling the differences that the supreme leader of the revolution has forbidden. Are we paying attention to this bigger evil these days?! Criticizing the position of some members of the parliament – for example, regarding doubting the official statistics – is a prohibition of negation, but aren’t these same people caught in a bigger negation by not allowing the rules of the parliament, and are they not the first to receive the prohibition of negation? The appointment of an incompetent element in a home ministry is of course a crime and it should be dealt with as soon as it happened and ended with the least cost. to overshadow.
At a time when it is the best day for the system and the worst day for him, and when various political and intelligence circles admit that time is in the favor of the Islamic Republic, the enemy pretends that the Iranian system has weakened, and with this lie, he wants changes. to lead the region in a direction other than Iran, isn’t the strong action of Turkey and Saudi Arabia a clear proof of this issue. In this space, unfortunately, some people have rushed to the enemy’s aid by creating and deconstructing differences and by highlighting differences. We should devote ourselves to reflect the real image of Iran, which is the authority of its system, the great national popularity of its supreme leader, its tremendous scientific and civil progress, the intelligence of its political system, and its tremendous success in passing through terrible storms. This is the real picture of our vibrant religious system, not what is happening in the lowly party wishes of some of us.mostajar
