recognize enemy

Sometimes it is difficult to use words to convey meaning. And sometimes the concepts that the words carry are not paid much attention. Do we have a precise concept of friend or enemy, revolutionary and anti-revolutionary, extreme or extreme? It would be good if you are the reader of these lines to pay attention to the meaning of the words we use to express the meaning. 
The Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution has stressed the necessity of knowing the enemy at various times. And recently they have pointed out that anyone cannot simply be called a hypocrite or an anti-velayat faqih. Or they have said somewhere that you should be careful not to take an enemy as a friend or a friend as an enemy.
1. In the government of reforms, the political deputy of the Ministry of Interior in his writings considered the determination of border lines and geographical territory of countries as a matter of chance and basically denied the design of the colonialists, especially the old colonialists (England) to continue their colonial rule. He and his fellow thinkers in that period denied all enmity and enmity of foreigners and anti-revolution, they constantly accused others of having the illusion of conspiracy and basically they did not believe in the sense that the holy Islamic system is exposed to the conspiracy of foreign and domestic enemies. has it . At that point, the ruling slogan was “Opponent to Opponent”, “Opponent to Critic” and “Critic to Friend”. And on this basis, they gave up friendship with those who were driven away by the Imam (RA), unaware that some stubbornness and enmity are inherent. And they have a problem with the basis of the Islamic revolution, and by insisting on the ideals and values that govern the revolution and the Islamic system that arose from it, we cannot expect to turn opponents into opponents, or opponents into critics, etc. Therefore, a part of the country’s facilities and the energy of the system officials were engaged in making the ruling party, the executive and the legislature (the 6th parliament) understand that hostility is necessary and that too much optimism is not the beauty of the rulers. And denying the reality of enemies’ enmity does not solve the problem. And therefore, one should not think of enemies as friends. 
And… in the end, the nation, which did not see an iota of deviation from the ideals and values of the ruling system, and was vigilantly watching the behavior and performance of the ruling party in the executive branch, gave a striking and at the same time confusing answer to this spectrum at the ballot boxes. In the second term of the elections of the Islamic Councils and the seventh term of the Islamic Council.
2. Enemy of any critic or protester has become the dominant approach of the media flow, official forums, etc. in recent months in the country. And the country’s propaganda situation has gone to such a direction that many of those who are considered to be the close companions of the Imam and the position of Supreme Leader, and who have been under the leadership of His Holiness for many years, have held various responsibilities in the three forces of the country, and sometimes they have been the head of the mentioned authority. They are accused of all kinds of corruption and economic, political and even security crimes. And in a purposeful way, the emotional atmosphere that governs public gatherings is pushed to a direction where the cry of death to…, death to…, covers the crowd! So that it will be understood to them that they have been angered by the people. Regardless of the fact that during the post-election protests, some of the properties were abused by the enemies and they themselves committed illegal actions, but should they be punished for this alone?  Is he considered the enemy of the holy Islamic system? And insisted on removing them completely from the stage? Do because today  A political trend has committed mistakes and actions against the interests of the system and the revolution. Should the whole thirty years of light history after the victory of the revolution be introduced as full of blackness, deviation and betrayal? Should we list all the former heads of state and councils after the revolution for distancing themselves from the system and its governing ideals and their enmity with Islamic governance? If all the elders of the system are anti-revolutionary and against the Islamic system and are in charge of foreigners, then who can be trusted?! 
3. Despite the frequent recommendations of the Holy Shariah and the leadership of the system on moderation and moderation, the reality is that the country has always suffered from the excesses of the elites, the media, and the holders of small and large positions, and every intellectual and political current that is based on the executive affairs of the country has been placed, it has not been immune from extremism, which has caused the Muslim people and revolutionaries to suffer a lot. 
Certainly, the average intelligence and insight of the members of the nation, who are free from political and factional hatreds, is higher than the elites of the society. They have shown more tact in recognizing their duty and acting on it, and wherever it was necessary, they have not hesitated for a moment to decisively support the leadership of the system and national interests and have entered the scene. The author has witnessed in various gatherings that the majority of people have avoided joining extreme and harsh slogans and actions. Both in the protest gatherings that took place in the first week after the election results were announced, and in the gatherings that were formed to support the principle of the system and the absolute authority of the jurist. In the saga of the 9th of Day, despite significant preparations to push people’s thoughts and opinions and chant slogans against those who have become famous as the leaders of the protest movement, many people were not willing to go along with these slogans, rather than being satisfied with the performance of these people. , but they even protested their statements, speeches and even their untimely silences. But seeing them as equals with the hypocrites, America and England, and basically putting them in the ranks of the enemies of the system and against the revolution, they did not understand. 
The last word is that in the current situation where the amount of threats and pressures from enemies is increasing and the country needs peace and unity to move towards growth and excellence in all economic, scientific, cultural and foreign policy fields, the alert and Muslim people of the country expect the elites. And the political currents, obeying the authority of the Supreme Leader, have followed the policy of moderation, and one side has endeavored to draw and demarcate positions with anti-revolutionaries and foreigners, and the other side has separated the protesters from the anti-revolutionaries and the enemy, and does not insist on removing the country’s capital.