Continuation of Fitna 88

The Assembly of Fighting Clergymen and Seyyed Mohammad Khatami at the head of it are trying to create the ground for their reappearance in the political arena of the country while forgetting their actions during the Fitna 88 in the public opinion with media advertisements. A project in which the election of the 9th Parliament is considered a turning point

“Etimad” newspaper, which has been suspended for about a year and a half, has resumed its publication on Saturday, in its new round of publication, it seeks to revive the rejected and passive status of reformists in the political arena of Iran after the events after the presidential elections. The republic is centered on the assembly of militant clerics.

This issue, which has been raised by some political experts, took on the color of reality on the first day of its publication, and while Seyyed Mohammad Khatami was introduced by the people as one of the leaders of sedition, this newspaper began to publish his message in bold. He told his reporters to try to separate Khatami from Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, and revive his role as a reform leader..

This scenario has been keyed by “Elias Hazrati” as the responsible manager of Etemad, and political activists believe that the process of acquitting the leaders of sedition, which accelerated last year after the scattered incidents on 25th of Bahman, will continue this year as well. The issue that was addressed by Ibrahim Yazdi’s words at the beginning of 1990 and has now reached Khatami.

The positions and actions of Seyyed Mohammad Khatami in recent weeks indicate an attempt to define a new demarcation with other sedition leaders; An issue that has taken on new dimensions with the publication of some news about the imminent publication of a letter by him, in which he emphasized the necessity of separating the flow of reforms from the flow of sedition..

This issue has attracted the attention of political activists since he sought to introduce himself as the leader of reforms and this movement from the first days of the formation of the chaos movement and by downplaying the role of Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, he created the ground for his reappearance. – After the presidency – to provide power in equations; An issue that took on the color of reality with the publication of several news about his intense verbal conflict with Mousavi over the leadership of the so-called Green movement..

In recent months, Mohammad Khatami has been informed of the strong support of the main members of the reform movement to retake the reform movement flag by himself, and for this reason, he is looking for a new definition of the political arrangement in the front of the opponents of the regime in order to return the lost legitimacy of the reforms. The head of the Baran Foundation seeks to create a “fake border “ in this context. It is between the movement of sedition and the spectrum of reforms, so that in this way it can gather its own current under the banner of “reformists who believe in the framework of the system” and by presenting itself as the “savior” of the reformists, not only prevent the removal of this movement, but also the ground for its reappearance. provide it in the political arena of the country.

At the same time, he is trying to pull himself out from under the “ruins of Fitna 88” and not succumb to political death like Mousavi and Karroubi. This favorable scenario of Khatami, however, faces difficult obstacles. One of these serious obstacles is that Mohammad Khatami is still recognized by public opinion as one of the sides of the triangle of leaders of sedition, and the positions of him and his affiliated party (Assembly of Militant Clergy) during last year’s riots are visible in his list of heavy accusations .

Based on this, Mr. Khatami along with the Assembly of Clergy, guided by Fitna 88, issued a bloody statement on Saturday 30 June 2088, supported the deviant slogans “Neither Gaza, nor Lebanon” and “Iranian Republic”, defended the current of harassment on the day of Ashura and the founder of the Islamic Republic. And… is accused. He also legitimized the counter-revolutionary actions against the regime that were carried out under the banner of reforms. Despite these facts, the head of the Baran Foundation intends to advance the scenario of demarcation in the course of sedition, despite the fact that he has not been willing to apologize and withdraw from his previous positions .

These experts believe that now the politicians know that due to the general hatred of the society towards the leaders of sedition, if they want to continue their political activities within the framework of the system and different factions, they must stay away from these people and announce this issue officially. An issue that marked a bitter end for all the actions of Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi

MOSTAJAR