Hashemi Rafsanjani, in an article on the occasion of the anniversary of the constitutional movement, warned about anti-religious and anti-spiritual movements.
Recalling the story of Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri’s beheading, he wrote: Even though the constitution tried to perpetuate the hereditary royal government even for a child like Ahmad Shah Qajar, but when it saw “Mashrooah” as its suffix, it revived this hope – albeit for a short time – in the heart of the tyrannical society that the scholars of the amendment of the law They have basic supervision and do not allow a law contrary to the provisions of Islam to be approved to be implemented in the Islamic land… The bitter and sweet constitutional events have many lessons for the possibility of repetition, the veins of which can be seen today in the complex program of anti-spirituality, focus avoidance and deceiving people. we see A program that has forced even the fundamentalist and reformists to admit and warn that the constitution should not be repeated. Is it other than that the enemies of Iran have climbed the ladder of popularity of the clergy and academics in the eyes of the people and have conquered the sources of power in the constitution and then given the flag of sovereignty to the hands of the westernized students of their school? And isn’t it the fact that even today, in the Islamic revolution, which we have achieved victory with the leadership of the clergy and the unique leadership of a public authority, they call out the ineffectiveness of the clergy without restraint and without fairness?
The following is the article: The designers of those ominous plans, which we have many evidences of the bloodshed of Ayatollah Behbahani, Ayatollah Modares, Ayatollah Tabatabayi, Sheikh Mohammad Khayabani and other great scholars and clerics in the constitutional history, have started working in these years to Abusing internal taste differences and seemingly valuable literature of some to complete their anti-spirituality program. Because they know better than anyone, throughout the history, wherever an internal or external tyrant has pulled a belt from the society, the spirituality has been the shelter and protection of the people.
What is ambiguous and questionable in Mr. Hashemi’s analysis is that, first of all, during the last decade, who assassinated the character of Ayatollah Shaheed Sheikh Fazlullah Noori and introduced him as a supporter of tyranny and autocracy? Other than chain publications under the protection of brokers and reformers?! Secondly, Mr. Hashemi has rightly defended the “legitimate” restriction for the constitution, but there is a question as to who crossed out the “Islamic” restriction in the phrase “Islamic Republic” in the same sedition two years ago and falsely proclaimed independence, freedom, and republic. Are they Iranians? Were they other than those who chanted slogans in favor of America and Israel while fasting on Quds Day, and the only time they attended the Friday prayer and prayed with shoes and mixed (men and women) was the same Friday prayer that In it, Mr. Hashemi delivered a sermon in favor of seditionists and structural breakers?! Aren’t the instigators of this congregation in the reformist parties and publications (the authors of Mr. Hashemi) who described religion as the opiate of the masses, imitation as a monkey’s way, and spirituality as reactionary?!
Thirdly, didn’t these same enemies climb the ladder of the constructive government and after June 2, with the support of the alliance with agents and participation, didn’t they attempt to unravel the organized conflict of the government against the system, religion and spirituality? Were not the perpetrators of the 1988 sedition, who had gotten close to the likes of Mr. Hashemi, the worst enemies of the clergy? The perpetrators of Fitna 88, such as Bahais, hypocrites, royalists, secularists, Mehdi Hashemi gang, Mujahideen organization, Hizb-e-Sharavat, etc., which of them had the least compatibility with spirituality?
Fourthly, the difference between the clergy and the revolutionaries has always been created by the currents of pseudo-intellectual hypocrisy, which, among other things, during the period of construction and reforms, found the opportunity to help and benefit from the treasury and the establishment of the party and the newspaper, and in the chaos of 1988, in full form. Ayar came to the square.
And fifthly, which is most important, the constitutionalism and the national oil movement were defeated by the lack of leadership and the fiqh’s governorship, while the Islamic Republic is inviolable thanks to the fiqh’s governorship. Of course, in the midst of this, it should be seen whether the friends of the Revolutionary Front, including Mr. Hashemi, fulfilled their duties and responsibilities in this regard, including in Fitna 88, or was their behavior a violation of the intention and cottoning of strings? It should be seen that the seditionists and hypocrites who falsely supported Mr. Hashemi and later blamed him with the worst words, were they supporters of Velayat al-Faqih (as a guarantee point for the republic and Islamic system against deviations such as the deviation of the constitutional movement) or sworn enemies. Have you eaten the one who chanted against the principle of the authority of the jurist, imam and leadership?!
From Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, who knows contemporary history and knows the real identity of the American-Israeli sedition in 1988 and its agents, such reversals were and are far from expected, and it strengthens the possibility that some close and distant relatives Due to their illegitimate interests and immorality, or their external connections, they insist on exposing Mr. Rafsanjani to these inversions and denying the axioms of his character.
Mostajar
