About the cause or causes of the Syrian war and when that this war was decided, in recent months, interesting things have been raised and all of them are from people and sources that are known as “reputable” in the world, among them “Robert Fiske”, an influential analyst of the English newspaper “Independent” from documents He speaks which shows that after the assassination of Rafiq Hariri on 23 February 2013, the Saudi regime decided to eliminate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whom he identified as the main cause of Hariri’s assassination, at any cost. According to FISC documents, the war against the Syrian government was planned 7 years ago and started with the preparation of the Syrian forces and the military equipment of Bashar Assad’s opponents in 2011.
In the case of Hariri’s assassination, Basharasad and several members of the Syrian government are still accused. Robert Fisk says in this note that I was with the Syrian president when the news of Hariri’s assassination was given to Bashar Assad, and he was very surprised by this news. But an incident of this magnitude would be enough for the Saudi regime to strangle the Syrian government. The Saudi government first made a massive effort to force the Syrian army to leave Lebanon, contrary to the text of the Taif Treaty. At that time, by accepting the withdrawal from Lebanon, Syria actually showed that it was vulnerable to pressure, and therefore, since then, the pressure on Syria increased. Hariri court who never stopped exerting pressure against Assad, since the beginning of the terrorist war against the Assad government, the pursuit of Hariri’s case was abandoned by Saudi and the court!
Some time ago, in an interview with a European media, the former Prime Minister of Qatar revealed that Saudi Arabia decided to go to Syria even five years ago when Hariri was killed. to attack In that interview, Jassim bin Hamad mentioned the details of this issue. What Robert Fisk said and what Sheikh Jassim and others said about the causes of the Syrian war can be a combination of reality and mental analysis, but in any case, one point cannot be overlooked in all of them: “Syria’s security developments were not an internal initiative and arose from what they put forward under the title of oppressive relations between the government and the citizens.
It may be said that the Saudi regime started the war in Syria based on its desires, and in fact, because the leaders of this regime are very stubborn and vengeful, they created the war. Moreover, some people believe that Muammar Gaddafi was a victim of disrespect to the then king of Saudi Arabia – King Abdullah – during the Arab League conference.
But when we examine the dimensions of the war and the countries participating in it, we come across more interesting results. You may have heard that during the 33-day war that led to the defeat of the Tel Aviv regime, after a short period of time a review committee was formed and finally told the Israeli leaders: “The main factor behind Hezbollah’s victory in this war was the Syrian government’s unrelenting arms assistance and its effective support. After this conclusion, the Zionist regime decided to attack Syria and destroy it to do At the beginning of the Syrian crisis, some Iranian analysts claimed that Israel considers the survival of the Assad regime in Syria better than its collapse!
There are many reports that the Israelis have started training dissidents since late 2007. These days, the Zionist newspapers openly took a position against political negotiations and the opening of the negotiation table, and an Israeli personality said that Syria is dead and talking about the Golan Heights does not solve a dead problem.
It should not be assumed that Saudi Arabia and Israel each started the war in Syria with a separate and non-overlapping motive. If to the archive of 2004 and 2005 and 2006 Let’s look around and find out that the commanders of the Zionist regime have regularly talked about Tel Aviv-Riyadh relations and in the 2006 archive They have clearly said that the cost of the 33-day war was paid by Riyadh before it happened! Moreover, the 22-day war and the 8-day war started with Saudi money and Israeli missiles and bombs. With this description, what is the reason that the regimes of Israel and Saudi Arabia, which have worked together to fight Hezbollah, have worked separately in the war with Syria?
The Syrian war is the dirtiest war that the region has seen so far, because in this war, people are exposed to all kinds of harm, and they are hardly able to defend themselves from the economic and social level. What is the name of dropping bombs against such people other than “crime”?
The war in Syria, however, contrary to the initial idea of the Saudis, the Israelis and their affiliated forces did not bring Syria to a dead end. The effective assistance of Iran, which was at the advisory level at one time, and the assistance of Lebanon’s Hezbollah and the assistance of the people of Afghanistan and Iraq in the form of Fatemiyoun and Zainbyoun, saved Syria from the imminent danger of collapse, but this work was done at a significant cost, in which the contribution of human resources is important. has had more Everyone knows that Iran does not have Saudi money, and everyone knows that, unlike Iran, Saudi Arabia does not have a problem with the arms transfer lines to Syria. But if we examine the conditions governing the Syrian war today, we can comment on the winner of the Syrian war. The Syrian nation is involved in this war with more than half of the world and half of the region. The standing of the people and its continuity is attractive to the people of the world and causes this question to come to the audience’s mind: “What would happen if these blows were inflicted on the people and government of Saudi instead of the people in Syria”?
In this war, the forces loyal to the Syrian government are fighting, waiting and wanting to build the future of their country. On the other side, there are at least two governments that only want to take revenge on Syria. With this description, how can one be convinced about these two that the avenger is the winner?
The war in Syria is an all-out war and it becomes difficult to manage the war when it finds different international sides. In these days, we witnessed that while the resistance front was managing the battlefield with successive victories, it suddenly faced an agreement between the United States and Russia.
At the same time, for Iran, the “Syrian war” is a war with those who threaten Iran with military action every day. America, Saudi Arabia, ISIS and groups like that who are famous for their hostility towards Iran are the main parties of this war. It is clear that the war was started to shrink Iran and its authority, and if the enemy can achieve such a result gained from this war, in fact, Iran’s territorial position has been threatened. Some responsible institutions in the country think that interaction with Governments that do not accept the continuation of Assad’s rule will lead to the strengthening of Iran’s regional position. Apart from the fact that there is experience of such a matter in the world and – no nation has achieved its rights by closing its hands, when the influence of a country is lost, there is no reason to be respected by the powerful.
tenant
