The website of the British government network called the optimistic aspect of Hashemi’s coming to be in front of the government and the demand to change the constitution and writes: Our premise in this analysis is the existence of a real understanding in Hashemi’s mind of what the voters want from him. They expect him to have the same courage as Ahmadinejad in paving the legal path[!?] to pass the religious rule. We hope that he will come in such a way that Hashemi before 76 will only be reviewed in the historical papers of those years..
Akbar Ganji says that he would like to become His Excellency in Red and that it is possible.
He was the hired pawn of the radical parties during the reform period to assassinate Hashemi’s personality using the title of His Excellency the Red-headed of serial murders (years 77 and 78).. He now writes in an analysis on the Zamane Radio website: The election is an opportunity to transform the red-clad nobleman into the green-clad nobleman. Hashemi has played a key role in creating the current situation and has been one of the pillars. The Hashemi of the 70s is not the Hashemi of the 60s, and the Hashemi of the 80s is not the Hashemi of the 70s. He has gradually been marginalized. Hashemi’s 1992 election is Mousavi’s 1988 election .
He called for the creation of two poles against the rule of the Islamic Republic and the use of Hashemi in this space and writes: If this bipolarity is created, Hashemi will naturally be pushed into it. In that case, he must make a fateful choice. Be on the front of the government or the opposition .
The report of the Saban Center for Middle East Studies published on the website of the Brookings think tank is a read that clearly acknowledges; “Soft overthrow in Iran is impossible”.
Therefore, it can be seen that the enemy in the first election after the sedition of the year 88- Ninth Parliament elections in March 1990- chooses the strategy of challenge in participation.
The result of the election and the enthusiastic participation of 65 percent of the people in the parliamentary elections once again messed up the enemy’s confrontation with Iran..
Reuters wrote the same days in a report, despite the enemy’s strategy to challenge participation and discourage people from going to the polls; “ Iranian people are victorious in the elections”.
It is obvious that the duty of the enemy is an enemy, and every time he is defeated, he prepares in another field and comes to the field. For June 1992 elections, the enemy of the center of his movements and intrigues in 1991, the year leading to the presidential elections. Now, according to influential officials and Western decision-making media, it is easy to talk about the enemy’s strategy last year to influence this year’s elections..
The enemy’s strategy was first- “changing the calculations of the senior officials of the system” and second- “the line of separation of the people from the system”..
Interestingly, in February 1991, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy admits in an analytical article written by James Jeffrey; “Economic pressures– Read Sanctions – to force Iranian people to confront the failed regime. »
The Washington Post also writes clearly in March 2019; “Sanctions failed to create social unrest and force Iranian leaders to change their calculations . »
Therefore, in the continuation of changing strategies and desperation in facing Islamic Iran, in a situation where the challenge in the legitimacy of elections is not possible and the challenge in participation has also brought a bitter experience; what strategy will be chosen by the enemy? In addition, people have always had a more enthusiastic presence and higher participation in presidential elections than other elections such as Majlis or Shuras .
Susan Maloney, senior analyst at the Brookings Institution Wrote: Different faces have registered for nomination. Western analysts’ attention to Iran’s elections is an interesting issue and shows that politics in Iran is still competitive and attractive. According to IRNA, in this article written by Susan Maloney, senior member of Brookings, it is stated: The competition to elect Ahmadinejad’s successor began last week with the registration of candidates, and the election campaign shows a stunning competition.
It is noted in this analysis: It is almost impossible to predict who the final candidates will be, let alone predict who will win the election. However, what is clear is that Iran’s presidential election is the start of another historical milestone in the path of evolution along with the turmoil of the religious-revolutionary government.
Maloney, welcoming Hashemi’s nomination and calling him pragmatic, writes: However, he is facing great obstacles; Obstacles that convinced many observers that his recent comments about the election competition are just a joke. Most important is his age, almost 79, which, in addition to raising questions about his ability, may mar his election campaign in a country with a young population.
He adds: More problematic is the inconvenient fact that he seems to have a more sentimental voting base among the Western media than in Iran. Among the Iranian establishment, Rafsanjani is widely viewed as a person with […] and ideologically untrustworthy. The people did not vote for him in the parliamentary elections in 2000 and voted for Ahmadinejad in the second round of the presidential elections in 2007.
He then pointed to the fallacy of the Americans’ analysis about the claim that the election atmosphere was militarized and wrote: 4 years ago Hillary Clinton, the then Secretary of State and many researchers predicted that Iran is becoming a military dictatorship. But now many of these predictions have been abandoned. Let’s be clear. As the preliminary maneuvers of the 2013 election campaign show, politics in Iran is still competitive, unpredictable and fascinating.
Now, the serious question is that in this competitive and attractive election, can the enemies dress the 80-year-old old man of the revolution in green clothes and suddenly put him to sleep next to Mousavi, Karubi, and Montazeri?
Will the children of this old man let the outcome of this revolution be at the end of the path of Janat al-Naim?
You have to wait until June 24, 1992!
mostajar tenant
